Clean Base Load Electricity
Less Expensive Than Burning Coal

However, to originate a method that can surmount the holding-back criticisms of the vested interests is the trick to be revealed.  Can a zero-emission source of power be discovered that does not burn fuel at all for the production of electricity? The answer is yes.

Where Nikola Tesla succeeded in making electricity available to humanity WE HAVE NOW SUCCEEDED IN MAKING IT CLEAN so humanity can survive and enjoy the fruits of the original invention long term.

The long standing fact is that atmospheric pollutants, now known as Greenhouse Gases, impact life on the planet more widely than simply changing the climate.  On the one hand there is destabilization of the atmosphere and the ozone layer, and on the other these gases also directly affect that ability of life to survive on the planet’s surface as clean air, water and food are essential for organisms, human and animal, to survive on Earth.

Then the long term considerations came into view and recognizing the limited life of available fossil fuels – that do not burn properly anyway – it was concluded that most research and innovation efforts are actually focused to further the financial interests of existing fuel suppliers in the coal and petroleum sectors.

There is no way to create a non-polluting economy other than by the widespread introduction of zero-emission technology that does not use fuels at all.

Clean Base Load Electricity Less Expensive Than Burning Coal

It became increasingly evident that solving the Global Warming problem needed to focus on solutions that would have a huge impact, and as electricity generation outweighed transport emission pollution in the ratio of 70:30 that electricity was the sector to be concentrated on.

renewables

As a replacement for coal as a fuel source and generator of constant on-demand electricity renewable energy suffers from its inherent limitations.

The sun only shines so many hours each day and varies in intensity with the seasons. The wind is more predictable than solar sources, however like solar it is not an “on-demand” energy source that can ramp up for immediate demand as required. Similarly wave energy systems suffer from variability and inability to be concentrated for immediate use as and when required.

Surprising Hydropower, which does provide about one third of all electricity production, has not been extensively developed over the past century as it has traditionally been the only source of clean reliable on demand electricity generation. No doubt the willingness of capital to be made available to less capital intensive coal fired power stations which were free not to account for the social costs of burning dirty fuels held back the widespread development of Hydropower projects.
The clear business driver has been the opportunity to make huge profits in the massive electricity industry using the cheapest and dirtiest of fuels – coal.

Clean Base Load Electricity Less Expensive Than Burning Coal

Inspired by Tesla’s observations and our own earlier experience with nuclear waste disposal/sea water desalination we came upon a new way to combine the principles used in those applications to produce a very efficient, clean and constant electricity production system.

The Outcome
We were left with “Waterfalls + Hydropower + Gravity + Water” as our matrix of possibilities for establishing our Clean Energy System enterprise to benefit humanity. And so the invention of a Zero Gravity Machine was envisioned and Zero Gravity indeed harnessed as a power source for moving water to produce electricity.

There are no practical barriers remaining to the large scale manufacture of this system based on earlier technological know-how.

We are not saying we plan to put a Man on the Moon! But we do think it theoretically possible, based on our technology to plan to build plants that generate electricity from water – without fuel costs – within 5 to 10 years, on a scale to match the Niagra Falls hydroelectric plant electricity output.  We do not feel there are any practical barriers to achieving this.  Refer: Niagra Power Corp

| | | | | |

Posted in: Clean Base Load Electricity Less Expensive Than Burning Coal.
Tagged: Base · Carbon · clean · CO2 · coal · dioxide · Electricity · emissions · Energy · Expensive · fired · gas · geothermal · greenhouse · hydro · Less · Load · n Burning · nuclear · power · reduce · solar · stations · Tha · thermal